<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tactical Philanthropy Podcast: William Thomson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2007/06/tactical-philanthropy-podcast-william-thomson/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2007/06/tactical-philanthropy-podcast-william-thomson</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 20:42:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Trachtenberg</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2007/06/tactical-philanthropy-podcast-william-thomson/comment-page-1#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Trachtenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 18:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2007/06/22/tactical-philanthropy-podcast-william-thomson/#comment-349</guid>
		<description>Interesting reference to philanthropic risk in your podcast. I think that&#039;s something worthy of more discussion. The question is what&#039;s at risk, considering foundations are required to give away their money? Unlike risks a business faces, if the &quot;investment&quot; doesn&#039;t pay off, the foundation&#039;s viability isn&#039;t threatened. I, agree, of course, there&#039;s a risk to the foundation&#039;s reputation or willingness to be daring next time around. But considering the organization itself isn&#039;t at risk--that ought to make it easier to make bigger bets.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting reference to philanthropic risk in your podcast. I think that&#8217;s something worthy of more discussion. The question is what&#8217;s at risk, considering foundations are required to give away their money? Unlike risks a business faces, if the &#8220;investment&#8221; doesn&#8217;t pay off, the foundation&#8217;s viability isn&#8217;t threatened. I, agree, of course, there&#8217;s a risk to the foundation&#8217;s reputation or willingness to be daring next time around. But considering the organization itself isn&#8217;t at risk&#8211;that ought to make it easier to make bigger bets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

