<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should FORGE Be &#8220;Saved&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2008/11/should-forge-be-saved/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2008/11/should-forge-be-saved</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 20:42:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kjerstin Erickson</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2008/11/should-forge-be-saved/comment-page-1#comment-4983</link>
		<dc:creator>Kjerstin Erickson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 04:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2008/11/should-forge-be-saved#comment-4983</guid>
		<description>Hi BAR,

You make  good point.  I agree that ‘transparency’ isn’t about selectively opening windows onto certain parts of the house when convenient – it is a glass house itself.  

I want to assure anyone that is listening that FORGE isn’t doing this as an “experiment”.  We consider, and have always considered, transparency to be both a responsibility and a way to doing business.  Many of our staff have commented that what attracts them to FORGE’s management style is the this commitment to honesty – to being frank and open about our strengths, weaknesses, and mistakes.  

This total transparency is what we consider the central feature of our ‘cool-looking’ website (thank you!).  Each of our projects reports monthly, and these reports go directly onto each project&#039;s blog in their full and unedited glory.  One reporting sections asks for “Substantial Problems or Issues”.  So for example, you can read about how 1 of our 2 preschools in the “Meheba Preschools” project has been facing attendance problems (http://forgenow.org/projects/2-meheba-preschools).  Or, how our Mwange Computer Center has been suffering from shortages of solar power, a broken generator, and difficulty recruiting equal ratios of males and females (http://forgenow.org/projects/18-mwange-computer-trainin/posts). You can also read about and follow how FORGE deals with this issues, whether they improve over time, or whether a project or aspect of a project gets cut completely.

We believe that experiencing problems and issues is a reality of development work, and ours are all out there for the world to judge.  And that&#039;s how we’ve always done business (though it’s never been paid attention to the same way before!). I remember a year ago during tax season I posted a blog on how easy the IRS made it for organizations to cheat and steal (http://www.socialedge.org/blogs/forging-ahead/archive/2007/11/06/accountability).  More than a few people felt I was out of my mind for writing that, but I felt like those are the things that nonprofits need to start addressing if we are to rebuild the trust that our sector needs to function properly.

I think that personally, a large part of the reason why I believe in this kind of honesty is that I was simply so idealistic when I started FORGE.  Everything you read from and about nonprofit leaders focuses on how rewarding and inspiring the work is.  I found plenty of rewards and inspiration, but I also found it to be brutally challenging on both personal and professional levels.  I grew up with FORGE, and had to learn how to release some of my natural self-critiquing perfectionism.  I think that my journey would have been easier if there were more (and more accessible) platforms and precedents for honesty, transparency, and the acceptance of a degree of imperfection in the sector.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi BAR,</p>
<p>You make  good point.  I agree that ‘transparency’ isn’t about selectively opening windows onto certain parts of the house when convenient – it is a glass house itself.  </p>
<p>I want to assure anyone that is listening that FORGE isn’t doing this as an “experiment”.  We consider, and have always considered, transparency to be both a responsibility and a way to doing business.  Many of our staff have commented that what attracts them to FORGE’s management style is the this commitment to honesty – to being frank and open about our strengths, weaknesses, and mistakes.  </p>
<p>This total transparency is what we consider the central feature of our ‘cool-looking’ website (thank you!).  Each of our projects reports monthly, and these reports go directly onto each project&#8217;s blog in their full and unedited glory.  One reporting sections asks for “Substantial Problems or Issues”.  So for example, you can read about how 1 of our 2 preschools in the “Meheba Preschools” project has been facing attendance problems (<a href="http://forgenow.org/projects/2-meheba-preschools" rel="nofollow">http://forgenow.org/projects/2-meheba-preschools</a>).  Or, how our Mwange Computer Center has been suffering from shortages of solar power, a broken generator, and difficulty recruiting equal ratios of males and females (<a href="http://forgenow.org/projects/18-mwange-computer-trainin/posts" rel="nofollow">http://forgenow.org/projects/18-mwange-computer-trainin/posts</a>). You can also read about and follow how FORGE deals with this issues, whether they improve over time, or whether a project or aspect of a project gets cut completely.</p>
<p>We believe that experiencing problems and issues is a reality of development work, and ours are all out there for the world to judge.  And that&#8217;s how we’ve always done business (though it’s never been paid attention to the same way before!). I remember a year ago during tax season I posted a blog on how easy the IRS made it for organizations to cheat and steal (<a href="http://www.socialedge.org/blogs/forging-ahead/archive/2007/11/06/accountability" rel="nofollow">http://www.socialedge.org/blogs/forging-ahead/archive/2007/11/06/accountability</a>).  More than a few people felt I was out of my mind for writing that, but I felt like those are the things that nonprofits need to start addressing if we are to rebuild the trust that our sector needs to function properly.</p>
<p>I think that personally, a large part of the reason why I believe in this kind of honesty is that I was simply so idealistic when I started FORGE.  Everything you read from and about nonprofit leaders focuses on how rewarding and inspiring the work is.  I found plenty of rewards and inspiration, but I also found it to be brutally challenging on both personal and professional levels.  I grew up with FORGE, and had to learn how to release some of my natural self-critiquing perfectionism.  I think that my journey would have been easier if there were more (and more accessible) platforms and precedents for honesty, transparency, and the acceptance of a degree of imperfection in the sector.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Stannard-Stockton</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2008/11/should-forge-be-saved/comment-page-1#comment-4982</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Stannard-Stockton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 03:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2008/11/should-forge-be-saved#comment-4982</guid>
		<description>Actually I think Kjerstin has been very forthcoming on a number of the issues you raise. She&#039;s been writing for quite a while on her on blog. However, I&#039;m not trying to express that everything is perfect or that we have every bit of information possible. I&#039;m sure if you asked any direct question, Kjerstin would answer. Try it out. Frame what you wrote above as a series of direct questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I think Kjerstin has been very forthcoming on a number of the issues you raise. She&#8217;s been writing for quite a while on her on blog. However, I&#8217;m not trying to express that everything is perfect or that we have every bit of information possible. I&#8217;m sure if you asked any direct question, Kjerstin would answer. Try it out. Frame what you wrote above as a series of direct questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BAR</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2008/11/should-forge-be-saved/comment-page-1#comment-4979</link>
		<dc:creator>BAR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 21:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2008/11/should-forge-be-saved#comment-4979</guid>
		<description>You say that the collective good will be served if FORGE survives because of the &quot;boost it will give to transparency.&quot;  Yet we are only seeing this transparency in one aspect of FORGE&#039;s operations -- namely, their financial status.  Unless there is equal transparency regarding the way they have spent the funds they do have, the work they are doing, the impact they have had, etc. -- not just some laudatory stories on a cool-looking website (not that the two are mutually exclusive, but they&#039;re not equivalent) -- I don&#039;t know that revealing financial troubles at a time of desperation is really striking a great blow for transparency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You say that the collective good will be served if FORGE survives because of the &#8220;boost it will give to transparency.&#8221;  Yet we are only seeing this transparency in one aspect of FORGE&#8217;s operations &#8212; namely, their financial status.  Unless there is equal transparency regarding the way they have spent the funds they do have, the work they are doing, the impact they have had, etc. &#8212; not just some laudatory stories on a cool-looking website (not that the two are mutually exclusive, but they&#8217;re not equivalent) &#8212; I don&#8217;t know that revealing financial troubles at a time of desperation is really striking a great blow for transparency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

