<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sloppy Writing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2008/12/sloppy-writing/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2008/12/sloppy-writing</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 20:42:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathaniel Whittemore</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2008/12/sloppy-writing/comment-page-1#comment-5638</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Whittemore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2008/12/sloppy-writing#comment-5638</guid>
		<description>Sean, maybe you felt sloppy, but I understand your points entirely. In fact I referenced them in my post about the award. 

This is an important indicator of the seriousness with which people are approaching social investment, which not to put words in your mouth, is to some extent at the core of your (and certainly my) excitement. 

I want GiveWell to succeed because I think something like GiveWell needs to and I believe they will be a learning organization and open to flaws in their methodology if they can be clearly identified.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean, maybe you felt sloppy, but I understand your points entirely. In fact I referenced them in my post about the award. </p>
<p>This is an important indicator of the seriousness with which people are approaching social investment, which not to put words in your mouth, is to some extent at the core of your (and certainly my) excitement. </p>
<p>I want GiveWell to succeed because I think something like GiveWell needs to and I believe they will be a learning organization and open to flaws in their methodology if they can be clearly identified.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

