<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s The Evidence For Evidence-Based Theories of Change?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2009/01/whats-the-evidence-for-evidence-based-theories-of-change/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2009/01/whats-the-evidence-for-evidence-based-theories-of-change</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 20:42:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: @HildyGottlieb</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2009/01/whats-the-evidence-for-evidence-based-theories-of-change/comment-page-1#comment-6334</link>
		<dc:creator>@HildyGottlieb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 16:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/?p=1231#comment-6334</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the Evidence For Evidence-Based Theories of Social Change? http://is.gd/eZOH Great post at Tactical Philanthropy blog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the Evidence For Evidence-Based Theories of Social Change? <a href="http://is.gd/eZOH" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/eZOH</a> Great post at Tactical Philanthropy blog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hildy Gottlieb</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2009/01/whats-the-evidence-for-evidence-based-theories-of-change/comment-page-1#comment-5837</link>
		<dc:creator>Hildy Gottlieb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/?p=1231#comment-5837</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Sean. A lot. What &quot;evidence-based&quot; does not take into account is that the work of &quot;changing the world&quot; (however one defines “world” - it could be a square block) is relatively new in the history of civilization. If we do not experiment and try new things - if we focus only on what has proven to work in the past - what opportunities we are missing!

Our potential lies in our creativity - our ability to synthesize and springboard not only from what has worked, but sometimes from what has NOT worked!

While in some areas of life, evidence-based is a sound way to go (I would prefer a doctor prescribe a drug that has some evidence behind it!), when it comes to how we evolve as societies, our potential is in what we can envision, and how we work together to create a path towards that vision.

Thanks for so strongly standing behind that point.  

Hildy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Sean. A lot. What &#8220;evidence-based&#8221; does not take into account is that the work of &#8220;changing the world&#8221; (however one defines “world” &#8211; it could be a square block) is relatively new in the history of civilization. If we do not experiment and try new things &#8211; if we focus only on what has proven to work in the past &#8211; what opportunities we are missing!</p>
<p>Our potential lies in our creativity &#8211; our ability to synthesize and springboard not only from what has worked, but sometimes from what has NOT worked!</p>
<p>While in some areas of life, evidence-based is a sound way to go (I would prefer a doctor prescribe a drug that has some evidence behind it!), when it comes to how we evolve as societies, our potential is in what we can envision, and how we work together to create a path towards that vision.</p>
<p>Thanks for so strongly standing behind that point.  </p>
<p>Hildy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

