<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Design Thinking in Philanthropy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2009/02/design-thinking-in-philanthropy/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2009/02/design-thinking-in-philanthropy</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 20:42:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Stannard-Stockton</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2009/02/design-thinking-in-philanthropy/comment-page-1#comment-6592</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Stannard-Stockton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2009/02/design-thinking-in-philanthropy#comment-6592</guid>
		<description>Thanks Tronn, keep us posted on your design thinking work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Tronn, keep us posted on your design thinking work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tronn Moller</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2009/02/design-thinking-in-philanthropy/comment-page-1#comment-6581</link>
		<dc:creator>Tronn Moller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 14:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2009/02/design-thinking-in-philanthropy#comment-6581</guid>
		<description>Hi Sean! I ran across the article in Fast Company also. It helped me out a lot.  I am consultant &amp; coach with community and faith based organizations in the US Gulf region that were impacted by the recent hurricanes. Partnering with them to transition from Recovery to Relief to Community Development. The transitons are moving slowly, but this article helped me think about new ways and approaches. 
So, if you hear about &quot;Design Thinking in Disaster Recovery&quot; or &quot;Design Thinking in Community Development&quot;. Its that guy Tronn from the Gulf region exploring. I&#039;ll keep you posted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sean! I ran across the article in Fast Company also. It helped me out a lot.  I am consultant &amp; coach with community and faith based organizations in the US Gulf region that were impacted by the recent hurricanes. Partnering with them to transition from Recovery to Relief to Community Development. The transitons are moving slowly, but this article helped me think about new ways and approaches.<br />
So, if you hear about &#8220;Design Thinking in Disaster Recovery&#8221; or &#8220;Design Thinking in Community Development&#8221;. Its that guy Tronn from the Gulf region exploring. I&#8217;ll keep you posted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Stannard-Stockton</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2009/02/design-thinking-in-philanthropy/comment-page-1#comment-6364</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Stannard-Stockton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2009/02/design-thinking-in-philanthropy#comment-6364</guid>
		<description>Christine, thanks for the reading list! Those all look great.

Great point Nathaniel. We can call it &quot;results based philanthropy&quot; or just &quot;doing what seems to actually work instead of what we think should work&quot;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christine, thanks for the reading list! Those all look great.</p>
<p>Great point Nathaniel. We can call it &#8220;results based philanthropy&#8221; or just &#8220;doing what seems to actually work instead of what we think should work&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathaniel</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2009/02/design-thinking-in-philanthropy/comment-page-1#comment-6360</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2009/02/design-thinking-in-philanthropy#comment-6360</guid>
		<description>Another great post Sean. 

This is the connection that has my girlfriend Emily so excited about the design world. 

One of the things I think is most valuable as a shared &quot;design thinking&quot; perspective is the focus on anthropology. IDEO doesn&#039;t sit in the lab, they go to the places and people for whom they&#039;re trying to build services and products and learn how they live their lives. They don&#039;t problem solve first, they see how they can integrate with current behavior, even if the goal is behavior shift. The &quot;Keep the Change&quot; Bank of America program is a great example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another great post Sean. </p>
<p>This is the connection that has my girlfriend Emily so excited about the design world. </p>
<p>One of the things I think is most valuable as a shared &#8220;design thinking&#8221; perspective is the focus on anthropology. IDEO doesn&#8217;t sit in the lab, they go to the places and people for whom they&#8217;re trying to build services and products and learn how they live their lives. They don&#8217;t problem solve first, they see how they can integrate with current behavior, even if the goal is behavior shift. The &#8220;Keep the Change&#8221; Bank of America program is a great example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine Egger</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2009/02/design-thinking-in-philanthropy/comment-page-1#comment-6351</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine Egger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2009/02/design-thinking-in-philanthropy#comment-6351</guid>
		<description>Sean,

Kind of scary how our research-paths keep overlapping! This is something I&#039;ve been digging into lately. I&#039;m especially interested in incorporating an understanding of the complexity sciences into the &quot;design thinking + philanthropy&quot; mix.

Some recent finds to add to your research:

@sinatraj (Ashoka&#039;s Joseph Sinatra) 
http://sinatraj.wordpress.com/2009/02/25/the-power-of-design-thinking/

Joe may have scooped you yesterday, but lots of previous thinking on this:

@openp2pdesign
http://www.openp2pdesign.org/blog/archives/835

@juneholley
2/22 and 2/24 posts on philanthropy and networks:
http://www.networkweaving.com/blog/

@p2173
Yet again, Lucy got a headstart on us all a full year ago:
http://philanthropy.blogspot.com/2008/01/davos-collaborative-innovation.html

Acumen, as described in this 2007 piece from BusinessWeek:
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_11/b4025405.htm

Googling &quot;design thinking&quot; and &quot;philanthropy&quot; unearths many more.

Again, though, the key is where design thinkers go when they&#039;re exploring new ways to approach philanthropy-as-design. IMHO we need to fold network theory, complexity theories, behavioral and cognitive theories -- all that stuff -- into the mix. Not as an alternative to other theories (i.e. philanthropy-as-linear-problem-solving) but as a complement, because the context of social/economic/political settings demands both.

Christine Egger
Social Actions</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean,</p>
<p>Kind of scary how our research-paths keep overlapping! This is something I&#8217;ve been digging into lately. I&#8217;m especially interested in incorporating an understanding of the complexity sciences into the &#8220;design thinking + philanthropy&#8221; mix.</p>
<p>Some recent finds to add to your research:</p>
<p>@sinatraj (Ashoka&#8217;s Joseph Sinatra)<br />
<a href="http://sinatraj.wordpress.com/2009/02/25/the-power-of-design-thinking/" rel="nofollow">http://sinatraj.wordpress.com/2009/02/25/the-power-of-design-thinking/</a></p>
<p>Joe may have scooped you yesterday, but lots of previous thinking on this:</p>
<p>@openp2pdesign<br />
<a href="http://www.openp2pdesign.org/blog/archives/835" rel="nofollow">http://www.openp2pdesign.org/blog/archives/835</a></p>
<p>@juneholley<br />
2/22 and 2/24 posts on philanthropy and networks:<br />
<a href="http://www.networkweaving.com/blog/" rel="nofollow">http://www.networkweaving.com/blog/</a></p>
<p>@p2173<br />
Yet again, Lucy got a headstart on us all a full year ago:<br />
<a href="http://philanthropy.blogspot.com/2008/01/davos-collaborative-innovation.html" rel="nofollow">http://philanthropy.blogspot.com/2008/01/davos-collaborative-innovation.html</a></p>
<p>Acumen, as described in this 2007 piece from BusinessWeek:<br />
<a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_11/b4025405.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_11/b4025405.htm</a></p>
<p>Googling &#8220;design thinking&#8221; and &#8220;philanthropy&#8221; unearths many more.</p>
<p>Again, though, the key is where design thinkers go when they&#8217;re exploring new ways to approach philanthropy-as-design. IMHO we need to fold network theory, complexity theories, behavioral and cognitive theories &#8212; all that stuff &#8212; into the mix. Not as an alternative to other theories (i.e. philanthropy-as-linear-problem-solving) but as a complement, because the context of social/economic/political settings demands both.</p>
<p>Christine Egger<br />
Social Actions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

