<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Philanthropy&#8217;s Exit Strategy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2009/04/philanthropys-exit-strategy/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2009/04/philanthropys-exit-strategy</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 20:42:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Stannard-Stockton</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2009/04/philanthropys-exit-strategy/comment-page-1#comment-6834</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Stannard-Stockton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2009/04/philanthropys-exit-strategy#comment-6834</guid>
		<description>Thanks Carla. I love to see you with your own blog these days! As I wrote on your blog, I agree that most nonprofits will not have the opportunity for a government backed &quot;exit strategy&quot;. But I don&#039;t agree that it only viable in one-off, &quot;unique&quot; situations.

Readers who are interested can see my full comment on Carla&#039;s blog &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.redf.org/2009/04/24/government-vis-a-vis-philanthropic-‘take-out’-strategies/#comment-10&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Carla. I love to see you with your own blog these days! As I wrote on your blog, I agree that most nonprofits will not have the opportunity for a government backed &#8220;exit strategy&#8221;. But I don&#8217;t agree that it only viable in one-off, &#8220;unique&#8221; situations.</p>
<p>Readers who are interested can see my full comment on Carla&#8217;s blog <a href="http://blog.redf.org/2009/04/24/government-vis-a-vis-philanthropic-‘take-out’-strategies/#comment-10" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carla Javits</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2009/04/philanthropys-exit-strategy/comment-page-1#comment-6833</link>
		<dc:creator>Carla Javits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2009/04/philanthropys-exit-strategy#comment-6833</guid>
		<description>Thoughtful post, Sean.  It is really intriguing to consider a rational system of philanthropic investment which tests innovation and is followed by government backing. While I think it may occur in unique cases, I would respectfully disagree that it’s likely to become routine.

I wrote a blog post outlining my rationale in more detail – I would love to hear your thoughts on it. http://blog.redf.org/2009/04/24/government-vis-a-vis-philanthropic-%E2%80%98take-out%E2%80%99-strategies/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thoughtful post, Sean.  It is really intriguing to consider a rational system of philanthropic investment which tests innovation and is followed by government backing. While I think it may occur in unique cases, I would respectfully disagree that it’s likely to become routine.</p>
<p>I wrote a blog post outlining my rationale in more detail – I would love to hear your thoughts on it. <a href="http://blog.redf.org/2009/04/24/government-vis-a-vis-philanthropic-%E2%80%98take-out%E2%80%99-strategies/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.redf.org/2009/04/24/government-vis-a-vis-philanthropic-%E2%80%98take-out%E2%80%99-strategies/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

