<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Glass Pockets: A Revolution in Foundation Transparency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2010/01/glass-pockets-a-revolution-in-foundation-transparency/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2010/01/glass-pockets-a-revolution-in-foundation-transparency</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 20:42:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Openworld</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2010/01/glass-pockets-a-revolution-in-foundation-transparency/comment-page-1#comment-8541</link>
		<dc:creator>Openworld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2010/01/glass-pockets-a-revolution-in-foundation-transparency#comment-8541</guid>
		<description>Interesting way to speed up connections between donors and applicants!  

As we move towards a &quot;real-time web,&quot; I&#039;m wondering whether similar results could be achieved through a fast-track system of venture philanthropy.

It might be a concentric system with a &quot;microgrant&quot; layer on the outer circle.  This layer would offer expedited review and grant-giving, much as Charles River Associates has done with early stage, small venture capital applicants.  Recipients who put the seed funds to good use (as shown by digitally recording and sharing milestones of progress) could earn &quot;karma points&quot; that would enable them to enter the next level of larger grant-seeking opportunities.  And then those who do well with these grants can cross the threshold of the next level of funding opportunities, where they can compete for more substantial grants.

Creating layered opportunities to earn karma points (convertible to attention/visibility on the radar of donors in future funding rounds) might also improve ecosystems of cooperation among grant applicants, as hoped for in the Grantsfire summary.

For example, donors could offer paths for unsuccessful grant applicants to earn reputation points applicable to future fundraising rounds. The unsuccessful applicants could earn these points by volunteering in-kind services to help the funded projects.  In cases where the offers were accepted (and useful services delivered), the funded project receiving the help could award reputation points to providers.  This teaming approach could lead to relationships of value in future grant-seeking and full-scale implementation of initiatives.

Does this approach sound reasonable?  It could also fit into challenge offer scenarios for awakening human capital and dormant land values in economically depressed areas, as outlined at http://www.openworld.com .

Best,

Mark Frazier
@openworld @buildership</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting way to speed up connections between donors and applicants!  </p>
<p>As we move towards a &#8220;real-time web,&#8221; I&#8217;m wondering whether similar results could be achieved through a fast-track system of venture philanthropy.</p>
<p>It might be a concentric system with a &#8220;microgrant&#8221; layer on the outer circle.  This layer would offer expedited review and grant-giving, much as Charles River Associates has done with early stage, small venture capital applicants.  Recipients who put the seed funds to good use (as shown by digitally recording and sharing milestones of progress) could earn &#8220;karma points&#8221; that would enable them to enter the next level of larger grant-seeking opportunities.  And then those who do well with these grants can cross the threshold of the next level of funding opportunities, where they can compete for more substantial grants.</p>
<p>Creating layered opportunities to earn karma points (convertible to attention/visibility on the radar of donors in future funding rounds) might also improve ecosystems of cooperation among grant applicants, as hoped for in the Grantsfire summary.</p>
<p>For example, donors could offer paths for unsuccessful grant applicants to earn reputation points applicable to future fundraising rounds. The unsuccessful applicants could earn these points by volunteering in-kind services to help the funded projects.  In cases where the offers were accepted (and useful services delivered), the funded project receiving the help could award reputation points to providers.  This teaming approach could lead to relationships of value in future grant-seeking and full-scale implementation of initiatives.</p>
<p>Does this approach sound reasonable?  It could also fit into challenge offer scenarios for awakening human capital and dormant land values in economically depressed areas, as outlined at <a href="http://www.openworld.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.openworld.com</a> .</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Mark Frazier<br />
@openworld @buildership</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Stannard-Stockton</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2010/01/glass-pockets-a-revolution-in-foundation-transparency/comment-page-1#comment-8539</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Stannard-Stockton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2010/01/glass-pockets-a-revolution-in-foundation-transparency#comment-8539</guid>
		<description>Mark, the closest I&#039;ve seen to doing what you&#039;re looking for is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.grantsfire.org/static/GrantsFire_Concept.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Grantsfire&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, the closest I&#8217;ve seen to doing what you&#8217;re looking for is <a href="http://www.grantsfire.org/static/GrantsFire_Concept.pdf" rel="nofollow">Grantsfire</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Openworld</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2010/01/glass-pockets-a-revolution-in-foundation-transparency/comment-page-1#comment-8529</link>
		<dc:creator>Openworld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 04:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2010/01/glass-pockets-a-revolution-in-foundation-transparency#comment-8529</guid>
		<description>Have any of these foundations moved to implement XBRL (extensible business reporting language) tagging of their financial flows?

More here - 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XBRL

If the foundations were to offer hosted, XBRL-compliant administration solutions for grant recipients (with dashboards for easy administration), it would be possible to extend financial transparency and accountability farther still. 

Best,

Mark Frazier
@openworld @buildership</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have any of these foundations moved to implement XBRL (extensible business reporting language) tagging of their financial flows?</p>
<p>More here &#8211;<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XBRL" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XBRL</a></p>
<p>If the foundations were to offer hosted, XBRL-compliant administration solutions for grant recipients (with dashboards for easy administration), it would be possible to extend financial transparency and accountability farther still. </p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Mark Frazier<br />
@openworld @buildership</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bradford Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2010/01/glass-pockets-a-revolution-in-foundation-transparency/comment-page-1#comment-8495</link>
		<dc:creator>Bradford Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tacticalphilanthropy.com/2010/01/glass-pockets-a-revolution-in-foundation-transparency#comment-8495</guid>
		<description>The &quot;quiet launch&quot; was the pre-launch!  Thanks for the shout out.  For Glasspockets fully explained see http://pndblog.typepad.com/pndblog/2010/01/foundations-need-to-be-more-transparent.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;quiet launch&#8221; was the pre-launch!  Thanks for the shout out.  For Glasspockets fully explained see <a href="http://pndblog.typepad.com/pndblog/2010/01/foundations-need-to-be-more-transparent.html" rel="nofollow">http://pndblog.typepad.com/pndblog/2010/01/foundations-need-to-be-more-transparent.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

