<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Audacious Ideas Redesign</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2010/07/audacious-ideas-redesign/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2010/07/audacious-ideas-redesign</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 20:42:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marisela Orta</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2010/07/audacious-ideas-redesign/comment-page-1#comment-9496</link>
		<dc:creator>Marisela Orta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 19:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2010/07/audacious-ideas-redesign#comment-9496</guid>
		<description>I like &quot;Intrepid&quot; but could do without the alliteration of &quot;intrepid ideas&quot;. 

I like the idea of playing on &quot;brave new world&quot; phrase. What about &quot;Brave New Roles&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like &#8220;Intrepid&#8221; but could do without the alliteration of &#8220;intrepid ideas&#8221;. </p>
<p>I like the idea of playing on &#8220;brave new world&#8221; phrase. What about &#8220;Brave New Roles&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adin Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2010/07/audacious-ideas-redesign/comment-page-1#comment-9476</link>
		<dc:creator>Adin Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2010/07/audacious-ideas-redesign#comment-9476</guid>
		<description>Animal House? Really? Hmm...

Additional suggestions:
1. Resolute Ideas
2. Intrepid Ideas
3. Taking Bold Risks (?) ;-)

I haven&#039;t checked out any conflict on these, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Animal House? Really? Hmm&#8230;</p>
<p>Additional suggestions:<br />
1. Resolute Ideas<br />
2. Intrepid Ideas<br />
3. Taking Bold Risks (?) <img src='http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/secure/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t checked out any conflict on these, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Stannard-Stockton</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2010/07/audacious-ideas-redesign/comment-page-1#comment-9460</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Stannard-Stockton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2010/07/audacious-ideas-redesign#comment-9460</guid>
		<description>Alright, I&#039;m throwing out Bodacious. The Animal House connection is totally inappropriate.

Other words I&#039;ve been hearing:

Breathtaking
Bold
Fearless

Thoughts? More suggestions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright, I&#8217;m throwing out Bodacious. The Animal House connection is totally inappropriate.</p>
<p>Other words I&#8217;ve been hearing:</p>
<p>Breathtaking<br />
Bold<br />
Fearless</p>
<p>Thoughts? More suggestions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Basnage</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2010/07/audacious-ideas-redesign/comment-page-1#comment-9457</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Basnage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 21:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2010/07/audacious-ideas-redesign#comment-9457</guid>
		<description>Bodacious has some overtones (thanks, Animal House)  that you may not want. How about &quot;breathtaking&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bodacious has some overtones (thanks, Animal House)  that you may not want. How about &#8220;breathtaking&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renata J. Rafferty</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2010/07/audacious-ideas-redesign/comment-page-1#comment-9456</link>
		<dc:creator>Renata J. Rafferty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 21:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2010/07/audacious-ideas-redesign#comment-9456</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d throw Hildy Gottlieb into the reviewer mix -- and I vote for bodacious as well.  Or, the Philanthropy Gone Wild blog (but you&#039;d have to put up a pic of yourself shirtless on the blog).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d throw Hildy Gottlieb into the reviewer mix &#8212; and I vote for bodacious as well.  Or, the Philanthropy Gone Wild blog (but you&#8217;d have to put up a pic of yourself shirtless on the blog).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2010/07/audacious-ideas-redesign/comment-page-1#comment-9454</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2010/07/audacious-ideas-redesign#comment-9454</guid>
		<description>Yes, it is funny, but then so are most new, bold ideas laughed at when first introduced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it is funny, but then so are most new, bold ideas laughed at when first introduced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine Egger</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2010/07/audacious-ideas-redesign/comment-page-1#comment-9453</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine Egger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 18:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2010/07/audacious-ideas-redesign#comment-9453</guid>
		<description>Bodacious my first thought, too :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bodacious my first thought, too <img src='http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/secure/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Stannard-Stockton</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2010/07/audacious-ideas-redesign/comment-page-1#comment-9452</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Stannard-Stockton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2010/07/audacious-ideas-redesign#comment-9452</guid>
		<description>Good thought on Tracy. Bodacious would be too funny. I like the way you&#039;re thinking!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good thought on Tracy. Bodacious would be too funny. I like the way you&#8217;re thinking!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbie Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2010/07/audacious-ideas-redesign/comment-page-1#comment-9451</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tacticalphilanthropy.com/2010/07/audacious-ideas-redesign#comment-9451</guid>
		<description>A nice &#039;problem&#039; to have --- to be inundated with response!  Tracy Gary might be a good candidate for your review board.  Could call it Bodacious Blurbs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A nice &#8216;problem&#8217; to have &#8212; to be inundated with response!  Tracy Gary might be a good candidate for your review board.  Could call it Bodacious Blurbs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

