Katya Andresen, head of marketing at Network for Good, sent me the following email regarding the GiveWell blog posts (found here and here). Kudos to Katya for her swift and excellent response:
Good marketing is about listening to the audience, acknowledging their perspective and having a conversation based on that perspective. A good marketing relationship is like any other relationship – it’s based in listening and conversation, and not simply monologue. This is more true than ever before with the advent of social networks, blogs, etc. The web 2.0 world gives us everyone – including donors – tools to talk to the world, and that means nonprofits have a new opportunity to listen, and sometimes, to start a conversation. I consider the Internet one big focus group – a place to see what donors, nonprofits and others are saying and doing, and a means to engage those audiences in conversations about what they care about. Donors blogs are incredibly useful – they are audience research, a feedback loop, a sounding board and a place to start a relationship – all rolled into one.
That’s all really easy to say, but hard – even painful – to experience. Blogs allow people the freedom to talk about your issue or organization in their own words, and that means a loss of message control, which can be difficult to embrace. Sometimes what people say online is not especially nice or constructive, or it may not be based in a thorough understanding of any issue. It can be unpleasant – and sometimes, I think it’s best not to respond if what you read is a cheap-shot from someone not very invested in the issue at hand. I’ve stayed out of some conversations for that reason. But often, what a comment or post online may lack in warmth, it more than makes up for in authenticity and passion, and, however much it hurts to read it (and it hurts, especially if you believe in what you do), it’s very useful to know what people are honestly thinking. Those honest thinkers are worth listening to and learning from, and speaking with.
In the case of GiveWell, it was very important to know people don’t have a good understanding of our fees, and why. Obviously, we should do a better job explaining them, and we will. I stand by our fees and believe they are incredibly fair considering all that we offer nonprofits, but if folks think they are not worth it, then I need to listen to that opinion – and learn from it, then do a better job as a communicator going forward.
If I were working in marketing at United, I’d spend more time reading www.untied.com and thinking about how to improve my company than I would on creating new ad campaigns.
4 Comments
This has been a really interesting interchange to watch. Your constant urging for foundations and donors to be more transparent and effective is something that is needed, I think.
This has been a really interesting interchange to watch. Your constant urging for foundations and donors to be more transparent and effective is something that is needed, I think.
Thanks, Kevin. I think that they will be in time. It is fun to watch new sites like GiveWell develop.
Terrific information, one that lends itself to becoming more retrospective and aware of the thoughts of our donors and customers. We need to consider the donors questions of “what is in it for Me?” Donor incentives go a long way in bringng the donor back and demonstrating true appreciation.