One Post Challenge Runner Up

I sent FORGE their prize money today. Congratulations once again to them and “a fundraiser”, the author of the winning post of the One Post Challenge. We also have a runner up. Thanks to a $250 prize offer by charity gift card company TisBest, I get to award a prize to the post that I thought was the best example of what I was trying to accomplish with the One Post Challenge.

Drum roll please…

And the runner up prize goes to Trista Harris for her post An Evacuation of the Ivory Towers. I think this is an excellent argument for something new and different in philanthropy and the post spurred a 17 comment conversation with Trista actively responding to her readers. You can read find the original post here with attached comments and I’m republishing the post below.

An Evacuation of the Ivory Towers

Today One Post Challenge entry comes from Trista Harris, a Program Officer and the voice behind, a blog about next generation philanthropy issues.

By Trista Harris

Today I am proposing nothing short of a revolution in the philanthropic field. What if foundations were connected to the communities that they were serving; innovation and creativity were encouraged; knowledge was shared within organizations and with the larger philanthropic and nonprofit sectors; and foundations were measured on the results of their investments, not just amount of money spent or number of staff? I know you are probably asking yourselves right now, “what kind of crazy alternative universe are you living in Trista Harris?”

I should probably back up. Any time you are proposing a revolution, it’s important to give proper background or else you scare people off. The philanthropic landscape is changing. Baby Boomers are beginning to retire or re-imagine their positions. Donors are more actively engaged and want measurable results, and the government is spending a lot of time and energy trying to reign in the philanthropic sector. Professional philanthropic staff are trying to figure out how to do more with less time. How do we re-invigorate our troops of professional do-gooders to make sure that are connected to the communities that they serve and have the capacity to move the philanthropic sector from potential to results?

As a life long staff member of nonprofits, I always cringe when someone, usually a board member, says “if you just applied business principals to your work, all your problems would be solved.” But, I think I have found an idea from the for-profit sector that could solve a variety of our sector’s ills. Flexible work schedules and telecommuting have become commonplace in many for-profit organizations, but a Minnesota company has taken flexibility to the next level with the results-only work environment. Best Buy, an electronics retailer, has given its employees full control of how, when, and where they work. A guiding premise is that “work is something you do, not somewhere you go.” This means that employees take conference calls while fishing and start project planning after their kids go to bed. This new model has decreased turnover but, more important to our conversation, has improved productivity by 35%.

What if Program Officers suddenly became office-less? What if we spent our time in the communities that we serve, rather than in a stuffy conference room talking about the community? Would this change force us to create knowledge management systems to connect this out-based workforce? Would that system then institutionalize the wisdom that is currently only available inside of an “about to retire” program officer’s head? How much more effective could our work be? Flexibility breeds innovation and it encourages collaboration outside of the “usual suspects.” The people that probably have the best insight about the need for a new community center are the moms and dads that are at a nearby playground during the day. That’s not who most Program Officers are rubbing shoulders with at 11am.

When people are measured by what they accomplish, not how much time they are at their desks, the rules change. Suddenly the star employee isn’t the one who arrives at 6am and leaves at 6pm, it is the one who is most knowledgeable about community solutions and has the most positive effect on their program area. How different would the sector be if we were all working at full capacity and still had time to be a good parent and an engaged community member?

I am proposing a revolution. So let me know, are you in or are you out?


  1. WOO HOO!! Sean, thanks for hosting such a fun competition and encouraging us all to think a little bit deeper about how philanthropy can be even more effective. I enjoyed reading all the entries and learned a lot about viral marketing from don’t tell the donor. For all of the writers and those who left comments, please stay engaged in the philanthropy conversation through blogs or other mediums, the sector needs your perspective and insights to reach its full potential.

  2. M says:

    Trista – you know I would be in!


  3. John Larson says:

    I work with fellow revolutionaries Cali Ressler and Jody Thompson – the ones who created ROWE for Best Buy. They are on their own, and have written a book about ROWE, entitled WHY WORK SUCKS AND HOW TO FIX IT.

    look for it in April or preorder on Amazon…

    Yours in revolutionizing the workplace!