Philanthropy Daily Digest

2 Comments

  1. Bruce Jordan says:

    Your insights are penetrating, and I think you are accurate, Sean. Would it be realistic to say that what you have described is a “maturing” of American philanthropy from a solitary, because-it’s-the-right-thing-to do activity to one that has many forms, many motivations and many expressions: an activity that is therefore more vibrant, more dynamic, more sustainable and more impactful than before?

  2. I think that is one good way to describe the shift from Philanthropy 1.0 to 2.0. It is certainly a maturing process. Thanks Bruce.